[gecode-users] Compiling in Mac OS X: .dmg Vs makefile

[Guido Tack]

Mauricio Toro wrote:
> I am trying to distribute some software developed for Mac OS X  
> Leopard Intel
> using Gecode. I have a problem. I compile my software using a Gecode  
> 2.2.2
> installed using make, make install, etc and it works great. When I  
> try to load
> my software in another Mac OS X Leopard Intel computer using Gecode  
> 2.2.2
> installed using the .dmg package, Gecode cannot be loaded and  
> therefore
> my software cannot be opened.

I guess it's Gecode 2.2.0, or you're a time traveler ;-)

> I am compiling my software this way:
> g++  -o examples/philosopherspd2.pd_darwin examples/ 
> philosopherspd2.cpp -I/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/ 
> Resources/src/ -I/usr/local/include/flext/ -DFLEXT_SYS=2 -lflext- 
> pd_s -undefined dynamic_lookup -bundle -I. -lgecodesearch - 
> lgecodecpltset  -lgecodeset -lgecodeint -lgecodeminimodel - 
> lgecodeserialization -lgecodekernel -lgecodesupport -ffast-math -O3
>
> How can I compile it in order to make it work with the framework
> installed by the .dmg package?
>
> Should I do it like this?
> g++  -o examples/philosopherspd2.pd_darwin examples/ 
> philosopherspd2.cpp -I/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/ 
> Resources/src/ -I/usr/local/include/flext/ -DFLEXT_SYS=2 -lflext- 
> pd_s -undefined dynamic_lookup -bundle -I. -L /Library/Frameworks/ 
> gecode.framework/gecode -ffast-math -O3

It should suffice to specify -framework gecode as an option when  
linking, and you shouldn't need any -I option for the gecode headers.   
Please consult Apple's documentation on frameworks, or consider  
linking gecode statically into your software (so that you don't have  
to rely on it being installed).

Cheers,
	Guido