[gecode-users] IntVar class container as parameter for branchers

[Christian Schulte]

Hi Christine,

 

If the data structure is small then you do not have to share it by use of a
LocalHandle. If it is maybe not so small then the use of LocalHandle might
be useful.

 

I personally always use LocalHandle when I can use it (that is, I have a
data structure shared between several entities in a space).

 

Best

Christian

 

--

Christian Schulte, Professor of Computer Science, KTH,
www.ict.kth.se/~cschulte/

 

From: users-bounces at gecode.org [mailto:users-bounces at gecode.org] On Behalf
Of christine bouzant
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:10 PM
To: users at gecode.org
Subject: [gecode-users] IntVar class container as parameter for branchers

 

Hello all,

In my script class, i have an array of CarDeparture pointer objects which
class contains several IntVar variables and some data information.

Inside the script copy constructor, i create a copy of the array of
CarDeparture objects using a CarDeparture copy constructor which updates
each of its IntVar variables and data.

I am thinking to set a CarDeparture object as a parameter for a brancher.

So, i should again do a copy of this object inside the brancher copy
constructor.

According to you, is it judicious to proceed like this concerning
performance ?

Or maybe, can i make the CarDeparture class inherit of LocalHandle (in order
to be space dependant ?).

 

Thank you all.

Cheers,

Christine

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gecode.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130423/c30b0cd5/attachment.html>