[Gecode] int/count

[Christian Schulte]

I just updated from CVS and noticed that the modifications by Gabor broke
the system badly (you forgot a method for Distinct::dom but still compiled
as Dom is a subclass of Bnd so onlt Bnd propgators were created) as well as
somethings were nonsensical. Things are delicate with distinct, if you don't
know what purposes some flags serve, please don't touh it at all!

I have fixed it but I think that the approach that I have to fix every
morning things that shouldn't have been touched to start with is going
nowhere.

Cheers
Christian

-- 
Christian Schulte, http://www.imit.kth.se/~schulte/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gecode-bounces at ps.uni-sb.de 
> [mailto:gecode-bounces at ps.uni-sb.de] On Behalf Of Christian Schulte
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:15
> To: gecode at ps.uni-sb.de
> Subject: RE: [Gecode] int/count
> 
> 
> This is definitely handwritten and as said I see currently no 
> need to change it in any way.
> 
> While I do appreciate your enthusiasm I think that you should 
> not try to do structural changes to Gecode at your current 
> level of expertise on your own. It might be a good idea to 
> seek discussion first.
>  
> Christian
> 
> -- 
> Christian Schulte, http://www.imit.kth.se/~schulte/ 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: gecode-bounces at ps.uni-sb.de
> > [mailto:gecode-bounces at ps.uni-sb.de] On Behalf Of Gabor Szokoli
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 16:55
> > To: gecode at ps.uni-sb.de
> > Subject: [Gecode] int/count
> > 
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Is all that source code in int/count handwritten or
> > generated? (I'd hate 
> > to waste effort modifying it only to be overwritten when 
> > re-generated...)
> > 
> > Gabor
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gecode mailing list
> > Gecode at ps.uni-sb.de http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/mailman/listinfo/gecode
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gecode mailing list
> Gecode at ps.uni-sb.de http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/mailman/listinfo/gecode
>